Neville Morley. On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 7:35 PM, nathan tankus <[email protected] > wrote:
> food for thought: If Graeber had cited a "Nathan Morville" rather then > a "Neville Morville" we would be arguing over this and whether making > that mistake showed how poor his scholarship was in the book. > > -- > -Nathan Tankus > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ > pen-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l > -- Cheers, Tom Walker (Sandwichman)
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
