Graeber's claim that the Federal Reserve's Open Market Committee is composed entirely of private-sector bankers save for a presidentially-appointed chairman?
Nathan Morville's complaining that Graeber conflates events in the history of the Roman Republic that took place centuries apart? The total train wreck that is chapter 12? Brad DeLong Professor of Economics J. Bradford DeLong U.C. Berkeley [email protected] 925 708 0467 On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 5:11 PM, nathan tankus <[email protected] > wrote: > I agree with Joseph. If there were multiple errors in his over 500 > page extremely well cited book, I might be more skeptical and critical > of him. the fact that this is the only quote that's been pointed to, > and copy editing has gone down in quality so much over the past few > decades, leads me to put no stock in the controversy. > > -- > -Nathan Tankus > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ > pen-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l >
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
