I'm less interested in debating anarchists than in working out ways in which cooperation in particular struggles is possible. As to Graeber's statement on Lou's blog, both Todd and Michael Yates have made excellent comments. I would add one point, though I think it is implicit in both their comments: Whether or not "unfree" labor is or is not predominant is not relevant: What is relevant is the kind of labor that _defines_ capitalism and thus establishes the conditions and contexts within which other kinds of labor exist. Graeber seems to generalize from an inadequate number of sources, and those sources not even named.
Carrol _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
