What bothers me about the passage on Lou's blog is, in a way, that it is 
badly written. It wasn't footnotes that I missed, but any sense at all in 
the writing that he had encountered much Marxist writing or for that matter 
had considered very carefully just what the hell he means by unfree labor. 
Your lecture at Berkeley had no footnotes, but it did have the 'thickness' I 
miss in the Graeber selection. (Sorry but the FHP article has the same 
weakness as Graeber has here.) Consider this short passage: 

" All those millions of slaves and serfs and coolies and debt peons 
disappear, or if we must speak of them, we write them off as temporary bumps 
along the road. Like sweatshops, this is assumed to be a stage that 
industrializing nations had to pass through, just as it is still assumed 
that all those millions of debt peons and contract laborers and sweatshop 
workers who still exist, often in the same places, will surely live to see 
their children become regular wage laborers with health insurance and 
pensions, and their children, doctors and lawyers and entrepreneurs." 

Note just two points in this horrible bit of prose: the sloppy use of "we" 
and the suspicious passive constructions. I would call attention to those 
matters in a freshman theme. It would take more than footnotes to justify 
such prose. 

Carrol 
--------------------------------------------- 
This was a passage -- a few paragraphs out of a very "thick" and rich book. 

As for the writing -- I thought it was the best writing I had seen from an 
academic in a long time. 

The generosity of his spirit shone through every line, but more, this was not a 
wall of words; it was, intentionally, an informal yet precise narrative and 
argument so constructed as to make the reader feel the need to become engaged 
with it, to complete it, to open it to others. 

The passive voice is not suspicious: he's talking about what has come to pass 
as homespun wisdom in the west and he is arguing that it's so much claptrap. 

You should read the book. 

Joanna 
_______________________________________________ 

_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to