On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Shane Mage <[email protected]> wrote: > > A "compromise," by definition, involves two parties each of whom makes some concession in order to arrive at a common position. When someone, allegedly radical, supports Obama--
Isn't there a difference between *supporting* Obama and voting for him? Isn't there room for a reasonable disagreement over which faction of the establishment constitutes the "more effective evil"? See e.g. Chomsky: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/10/01/noam-chomsky-if-i-were-in-a-swing-state-id-vote-for-obama/ Is he guilty of "supporting" Obama and therefore exposed as a faux radical? -raghu.
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
