"Robert Naiman" <[email protected]> wrote: > The likely status quo path is closed or no hearings, and maybe some > kind of FISA-like secret court. The question on the table is whether a > little activism could change the likely status quo path.
Not likely, see http://www.ga-asi.com, the website of a privately held company based in California. > ... It is likely that > if there is a public hearing on the drone strikes, the dispute about > low-balling civilian casualties will surface, and if this gets play in > the press it will drive down public and media support for the status > quo policy. And that could save the lives of innocent people who would > continue to be killed under the status quo policy, so it's worth > fighting for. ... I think the euphemism is "collateral damage". -- Ron
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
