Isn't US agriculture already collectivized in the interests of the big grain
companies, big seed companies, and big implement companies and other input
companies such as fertillizer giants.? Subisidies are also designed so as to
help larger farms most aren't they?
Cheers, ken
Blog: http://kenthink7.blogspot.com/index.html
Blog: http://kencan7.blogspot.com/index.html
________________________________
From: Doug Henwood <[email protected]>
To: Progressive Economics <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 11:11:40 AM
Subject: Re: [Pen-l] Obama in Israel
On Mar 21, 2013, at 11:59 AM, Robert Naiman <[email protected]>
wrote:
> I never claimed that the world was going to be all unicorns and ponies
> if Hagel was nominated or if Hagel was confirmed. I claimed that it
> was a war of position, and that if Hagel was nominated and if Hagel
> was confirmed, the position of people who want to reform US policy in
> the Middle East would be better. That's all. I realize that the
> ultraleft doesn't think anything that happens matters unless we have
> collectivization of agriculture. But that's not my view.
Why stop there? Let's go for full communism!
But really, nothing in the administration, the Democratic party, or the
structure of elite power suggests that your position was rooted in reality.
You're so busy trying to be "realistic" that you invent fantasies about
political possibilities. But at least you're not an ultraleftist!
Doug
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
