I'd go further and consider the net interest paid to GDP ratio, if we're in
this context.

Then there is the uber-Keynes view, to which I've become increasingly
sympathetic, that these ratios don't matter at all. (Note Japan's debt/GDP
ratio is 2.3 (230%) and while they have not been the greatest economy they
are not blowing up.)




On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Tom Walker <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks Julio, it's good to know somebody actually reads these ravings. As
> everyone with an ounce of understanding of economics knows, it's not the
> nominal amount of debt that matters, it's the debt to GDP ratio. More GDP
> means more revenue to service debt.
>
> But what if the Pope and the Cardinals don't believe in God? Could they
> admit it and still retain their hold over their flock (and the assets of
> the Vatican)? I mean what if the ruling class doesn't believe in the GDP
> and knows damn well that to admit the Emperor has no clothes would be to
> forfeit their hegemony and very possibly their necks.
>
> It seems to me that if our almighty and merciful rulers lost faith in GDP,
> they would go on a binge of asinine "austerity" and deflationary "debt
> reduction" all the while hypocritically insisting on the sanctity of GDP
> and holy growth. This would enable them to rake in as many chips as they
> can before the deluge.
>
> Suddenly, if you look differently at the GDP end of the debt to GDP ratio
> and don't assume liars believe their own lies, the austerity swindle makes
> a lot more sense.
>
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 3:22 AM, Julio Huato <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>> For more immediate purposes, there's still the question of whether to
>> use these measures or not.  I think it depends.  I admit that, in
>> principle, there may be cases in which GDP measures are not only
>> potentially misleading, but that it may in fact be impossible to
>> determine a proper way to correct for the bias.  Let alone the size,
>> the algebraic sign of the bias may flip, so that using GDP measures or
>> using "random" numbers may yield the same results.  That said, I doubt
>> it seriously that this is the case in general.
>>
>>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> Tom Walker (Sandwichman)
>
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
>
>
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to