Yes, if a + b = c, c - a = b. I knew that. By residual I meant 's' was
described to my ear at least as not reflecting some behavioral or systemic
process, but as merely the outcome of such processes in determination of c
and v and the output price.



On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Shane Mage <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On May 16, 2013, at 4:26 PM, Max Sawicky wrote:
>
>
> Your 's' sounds like a residual.
>
>
> Any variable in an additive relationship whose sum is known (money
> national income) can be calculated as a residual.  In fact, the monetary
> value of s is more directly known (as the after-tax sum of property incomes
> plus executive salaries) than either v or c, because calculation of those
> variables depends crucially on the distribution of wage income between
> productive (commodity-producing) and unproductive (overhead) labor and of
> government expenditures between social variable-capital wages (expenditures
> that absent government would be required, as variable capital, for the
> reproduction of productive labor power) and system maintenance (including
> the social wage of unproductive laborers whether in the private-capitalist
> or government sectors).
>
>
>
>  Shane Mage
>
>
> This cosmos did none of gods or men make, but it
>  always was and is and shall be: an everlasting fire,
>  kindling in measures and going out in measures.
>
>  Herakleitos of Ephesos
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
>
>
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to