Searching Google Scholar for sources that cite the Hammonds turns up 200
articles including this 1982 article: "THE EFFICIENCY AND DISTRIBUTIONAL
CONSEQUENCES OF EIGHTEENTH CENTURY ENCLOSURES," by Robert C. Allen,  The
Economic Journal, [December 1982), 937-953.

Again, searching for articles that cite Allen's article produces another
132 articles.

http://scholar.google.ca/scholar?cites=2682305908797385855&as_sdt=2005&sciodt=0,5&hl=en

On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 9:32 AM, William Quimby <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Answers to some of your question (1) might be found in John and Barbara
> Hammond's "The Village Labourer 1760-1832",
> published in 1911. See especially the chapters The Village Before
> Enclosure, The Village After Enclosure, and the footnote
> suggestions to government reports. [In my very skimpy scanning I did see
> the suggestion that rural population growth was
> very slow at the time, preventing exhaustion of natural resources.]
>
> A downloadable pdf (not terribly easy to read, though) can be found on the
> Internet Archive at
>
> <http://archive.org/details/cu31924032427019><http://archive.org/details/cu31924032427019>
>
> - Bill
>
>
>
> On 05/19/2013 4:24 AM, Gar Lipow wrote:
> > I'm interested in two related question on UK enclosure of the
> > commons.
> >
> > 1) How well were the commons managed prior to enclosure? Was the
> > grazing land being exhausted or was it preserved through limitations
> > on use? What about  forest a nd woods and wood lots used as sources
> > of firewood? Was firewood harvested from the same woods generation
> > after generation, or were the wood lots being exhausted? What are
> > the best sources on this? Is there controversy or is the story I
> > hear that the commons were successful in preserving resources across
> > generations widely agreed on?
> >
> > 2) After enclosure to what extent was grazing land maintained and to
> > what extent exhausted? And (for my purposes, more imortantly) to
> > what extent were wooded areas that had been preserved as sources of
> > fuel for generations exhausted, sometimes just for the wood,
> > sometimes to expand grazing land to raise more sheep and cattle?
> >
> > What are the most rigorous works that answer these question?. If
> > there is a serious controversy, what are the best works on both
> > sides? I
> >
> > -- Facebook: Gar Lipow  Twitter: GarLipow Solving the Climate Crisis
> > web page: SolvingTheClimateCrisis.com Grist Blog:
> > http://grist.org/author/gar-lipow/ Online technical reference:
> > http://www.nohairshirts.com
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
>
>


-- 
Cheers,

Tom Walker (Sandwichman)
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to