DOJ e-books trial: Apple's Cue explains 'agency' contracts and pricing, denies 
culpability
By Mikey Campbell
Monday, June 17, 2013 @ 06:25 PM

Apple's vice president of Internet Services and Software Eddy Cue retook the 
stand on Monday, looking to add clarity to U.S. Department of Justice 
allegations that the so-called agency model contracts the company signed with 
publishers caused an overall inflation in e-book pricing. 

During his testimony, Cue appeared to be in control, putting evidence from the 
Justice Department in perspective, including emails between himself and late 
Apple cofounder Steve Jobs. 

According to The New York Times, Cue said in court on Monday that Jobs was 
surprised that Apple was able to "create ripples" in the e-books industry, 
which at the time was dominated by Amazon.

“Wow, we have really lit the fuse on a powder keg,” Jobs wrote in a January 
2010 email. Cue said the comment was not congratulatory in nature, but instead 
pointed to how much of an impact Apple's ongoing negotiations with five major 
U.S. book publishers were having on the sector. 

The Apple executive did admit e-book prices did rise after the company entered 
the market with its agency model contracts, but noted the strategy allowed a 
number of titles which may never have been made into e-books to be sold in the 
digital marketplace.

The main thrust of the DOJ's case are the agency contracts Apple made with 
publishing houses. Key to the government's argument is the most-favored-nations 
clause, which disallows content owners to sell e-books at another retailer for 
a lower price. Cue said this was for Apple's protection, but the Justice 
Department asserts the tactic destroyed Amazon's ability to compete on price. 

Cue said publishers were ready to rebel against Amazon's wholesale model by 
employing a windowing strategy that would delay the release of a title's 
digital version until the more lucrative hardcover iteration had been on 
shelves for some time. Under wholesale, the Internet retailer bought content 
rights and sold e-books at or below cost, often at a set $9.99 price. 

“Amazon could have negotiated a better deal,” Cue said. “They had a lot more 
power.”

With more evidence being released to the public, a particularly interesting 
correspondence revealed Jobs read certain Apple-centric websites to gain 
further perspective on his company's dealings.

As a somewhat humorous side note, during the proceedings on Monday, Apple's 
lawyers used a MacBook, and presumably Keynote, to present its side of the 
argument. While the defense could easily switch between slides and perform 
advanced side-by-side and zoom functions, the DOJ could only show one slide at 
a time, with one video's audio completely failing. 

When presiding Judge Denise Cote asked whether the government lawyers were 
using a Mac, they replied "no," it was a Hewlett-Packard.

_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to