Thanks Jim. I automatically delete any post that contains merely a link with
no discussion from the sender. But in this case the source cited was clearly
of great importance, as you make clear below.

Carrol

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:pen-l-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Jim Devine
> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 10:06 AM
> To: Progressive Economics
> Subject: Re: [Pen-l] JP Morgan to eurozone periphery: “Get rid of your
pinko,
> anti-fascist constitutions” « Austerityland
> 
> from this link:
> Leigh Phillips writes:it [the JP Morgan manifesto] is >> the first
> public document I’ve come across where the authors are frank that the
> problem is not just a question of fiscal rectitude and boosting
> competitiveness, but that there is also an excess of democracy in some
> European countries that needs to be trimmed. [calling Samuel
> Huntington!!]
> 
>     “In the early days of the crisis, it was thought that these
> national legacy problems were largely economic: over-levered
> sovereigns, banks and households, internal real exchange rate
> misalignments, and structural rigidities. But, over time it has become
> clear that there are also national legacy problems of a political
> nature. The constitutions and political settlements in the southern
> periphery, put in place in the aftermath of the fall of fascism, have
> a number of features which appear to be unsuited to further
> integration in the region. When German politicians and policymakers
> talk of a decade-long process of adjustment, they likely have in mind
> the need for both economic and political reform.” [Emphasis added]
> 
> Yes, you read that right. It’s in dry, banker-ese, but the authors
> have basically said that the laws and constitutions of southern Europe
> are a bit too lefty, a product of their having been written by
> anti-fascists. These “deep-seated political problems in the
> periphery,” say authors David Mackie, Malcolm Barr and friends, “in
> our view, need to change if EMU is going to function properly in the
> long run.”
> 
> You think I’m perhaps exaggerating a smidge? They go into more detail
> in a section describing this “journey of national political reform”:
> 
>     “The political systems in the periphery were established in the
> aftermath of dictatorship, and were defined by that experience.
> Constitutions tend to show a strong socialist influence, reflecting
> the political strength that left-wing parties gained after the defeat
> of fascism.”
> 
> All this is a load of historical horse-lasagna anyway. Italy for
> example never went through a process akin to Germany’s denazification,
> and in Spain, the democratising king, Juan Carlos, played a major role
> in the transition. Only in Greece and Portugal were there popular
> socialist insurrections that resulted in or contributed to the
> overthrow of the regimes: the Athens Polytechnic Uprising played a key
> role in the Metapolitefsi or ‘polity change’ (although much, much more
> than the crushed student protests were involved here, including a
> failed coup d’etat and the Turkish invasion of Cyprus), and in
> Portugal a proper left-wing rebellion, the Revolução dos Cravos or
> Carnation Revolution, brought down the Estado Novo regime. Although it
> is true in the case of the latter three countries that their
> late-in-the-day construction of welfare states in the 70s and 80s was
> largely carried out by social democratic forces, the architects of the
> Italian post-war state were the Christian Democrats, who dominated
> government for 50 years.
> 
>     “Political systems around the periphery typically display several
> of the following features: weak executives; weak central states
> relative to regions; constitutional protection of labour rights;
> consensus building systems which foster political clientalism; and the
> right to protest if unwelcome changes are made to the political status
> quo. The shortcomings of this political legacy have been revealed by
> the crisis. Countries around the periphery have only been partially
> successful in producing fiscal and economic reform agendas, with
> governments constrained by constitutions (Portugal), powerful regions
> (Spain), and the rise of populist parties (Italy and Greece).”
> 
> Let’s parse that paragraph, shall we? Weak executives means strong
> legislatures. That should be a good thing, no? Let us remember that it
> is the parliament that is sovereign. The executive in a democracy is
> supposed to be the body that merely carries out the bidding of the
> legislature. There is a reason why liberal democracy opted for
> parliaments and not a system of elected kings.
> 
> Oh, and we want strong central states. None of this local democracy
> nonsense, please.
> 
> JP Morgan, and presumably the EU powerbrokers they are ventriloquising
> for, finally are being honest with us: they want to do away with
> constitutional labour rights protections and the right to protest. And
> there has to be some way to prevent people electing the wrong parties.
> 
> Thankfully though, the authors note, “There is a growing recognition
> of the extent of this problem, both in the core and in the periphery.
> Change is beginning to take place.”
> 
> In particular, they highlight how Spain has begun “to address some of
> the contradictions of the post-Franco settlement” and rein in the
> regions.
> 
> But other than that, sadly, the process of de-democratization (okay –
> I’m calling it that. They call it “the process of political reform”)
> has “barely begun”.
> 
> Well, the JP Morgan paper may have been written in English, but there
> is a venerable Spanish phrase that that all good anti-fascists right
> across the eurozone periphery know and is probably the simplest and
> best response to such provocation: ¡No pasarán!<<
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 7:33 AM, Louis Proyect <[email protected]> wrote:
> > http://blogs.euobserver.com/phillips/2013/06/07/jp-morgan-to-eurozone-
> periphery-get-rid-of-your-pinko-anti-fascist-constitutions/
> > _______________________________________________
> > pen-l mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Jim Devine /  "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your
> own way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante.
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l


_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to