On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Jim Devine <[email protected]> wrote:

> > By your reasoning, we should not have any expert panels deciding
> anything,
> > say Medicare reimbursement rates - those should also be decided by
> political
> > appointees, right?
>
> So-called "technocrats" _are_ political appointees. In any event, the
> point is that _all_ appointees, whether described as "technocrats" or
> not, should be held responsible to the democratic electorate rather
>


As I said there is a difference between accountability and oversight, and
day-to-day decision-making.

And you can't have it both ways: you cannot criticize the concept of an
"independent" Fed on the grounds that it is unelected and at the same time
deplore that it is politically appointed.
-raghu.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to