"Shane Mage" <[email protected]> wrote: 


> On Jul 5, 2013, at 3:05 PM, Jurriaan Bendien wrote: 




> > It is certainly true that capitalism develops through booms and slumps, but 
> > it is difficult to prove this is a cyclical process 


> If something is "certainly true," why should anybody need to "prove" it? 







Because it would identify in what sense it is true. If it were true, capitalism 
would return to a previous 

state which would, IMO, require a rather coarse measure of state. 




I had math professor that would always give students a hard time when making 
the statement that 

a part of a proof was obvious. 




-- 

Ron 


_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to