On Jul 5, 2013, at 8:08 PM, [email protected] wrote:
"Shane Mage" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Jul 5, 2013, at 3:05 PM, Jurriaan Bendien wrote:
> > It is certainly true that capitalism develops through booms and
slumps, but it is difficult to prove this is a cyclical process
> If something is "certainly true," why should anybody need to
"prove" it?
Because it would identify in what sense it is true. If it were true,
capitalism would return to a previous
state which would, IMO, require a rather coarse measure of state.
I had math professor that would always give students a hard time
when making the statement that
a part of a proof was obvious.
Do you really think that historical processes are mathematical?
Shane Mage
"Thunderbolt steers all things." Herakleitos of Ephesos, fr. 64
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
