When Marx made the argument below, was he arguing against a specific argument 
made by specific thinker that he believed needed to be rebutted?  Was there 
someone out there arguing that human action is not planned (or perhaps the 
better word is "pre-imagined")?

I hasten to add that the argument that (1) because human labor is planned (or 
"pre-imagined"), and (2) a capitalist economy is not centrally planned, 
capitalism is contrary to human nature, is a complete non-sequitor.  

David Shemano

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Charles Brown
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2014 4:08 AM
To: Forum for the discussion of theoretical issues raised by Karl Marx and the 
thinkers he inspired; marxist-debate; a-list; lbo-talk; pen-l
Subject: [Pen-l] Why Marxists consider a planned economy in accord with human 
nature

A la Karl Marx, the distinct characteristic of human labor is that it is 
planned. This is part of the "sapiens" or rationality or wisdom of _homo 
sapiens_. (Sapiens, a Latin word meaning wise)  The anarchy of production of 
capitalism is contrary to our human nature and original species wisdom.  Thus, 
a main feature of the Soviet efforts was to plan the whole ( "centralized" 
planning means planning the whole; holism or the inter-connectedness of the 
whole is a principle of dialectical logic).  Of course, planning the whole 
involves reciprocal and continuous communication between the center , 
representing the whole ,and the parts, regions, cities, countries' and
continuous adjustments of the plan.   Any shortcomings in Soviet
historical practice do not refute the theoretical correctness of the policy.

CB


"A spider conducts operations that resemble those of a weaver, and a bee puts 
to shame many an architect in the construction of her cells.
But what distinguishes the worst architect from the best of bees is this, that 
the architect raises his structure in imagination before he erects it in 
reality. At the end of every labour-process, we get a result that already 
existed in the imagination of the labourer at its commencement."


Marx's _Capital_ Vol. I: " Labour is, in the first place, a process in which 
both man and Nature participate, and in which man of his own accord starts, 
regulates, and controls the material re-actions between himself and Nature. He 
opposes himself to Nature as one of her own forces, setting in motion arms and 
legs, head and hands, the natural forces of his body, in order to appropriate 
Nature's productions in a form adapted to his own wants. By thus acting on the 
external world and changing it, he at the same time changes his own nature. He 
develops his slumbering powers and compels them to act in obedience to his 
sway. We are not now dealing with those primitive instinctive forms of labour 
that remind us of the mere animal. An immeasurable interval of time separates 
the state of things in which a man brings his labour-power to market for sale 
as a commodity, from that state in which human labour was still in its first 
instinctive stage. We pre-suppose labour in a form that stamps it as 
exclusively human. A spider conducts operations that resemble those of a 
weaver, and a bee puts to shame many an architect in the construction of her 
cells. But what distinguishes the worst architect from the best of bees is 
this, that the architect raises his structure in imagination before he erects 
it in reality. At the end of every labour-process, we get a result that already 
existed in the imagination of the labourer at its commencement. He not only 
effects a change of form in the material on which he works, but he also 
realises a purpose of his own that gives the law to his modus operandi, and to 
which he must subordinate his will. And this subordination is no mere momentary 
act. Besides the exertion of the bodily organs, the process demands that, 
during the whole operation, the workman's will be steadily in consonance with 
his purpose. This means close attention. The less he is attracted by the nature 
of the work, and the mode in which it is carried on, and the less, therefore, 
he enjoys it as something which gives!
  play to
 his bodily and mental powers, the more close his attention is forced to be. "
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to