"Leaving Work Behind" is the title of a 2/8/2014 NYT essay by the conservative 
columnist Ross Douthat.  The URL for the column is:

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/09/opinion/sunday/douthat-leaving-work-behind.html?partner=rssnyt&emc=rss

Douthat uses the flap about Obamacare's supposed work disincentive as a 
departure point.

The thrust of the column is to open a discussion of providing a Basic Income 
Guarantee (BIG) or Negative Income Tax to replace other parts of the welfare 
state.

This emerging advocacy of a BIG on the right is troubling.  You'll find this 
paragraph in the Douthat piece:  

> But it’s also possible to argue that as a rich, post-scarcity society, we 
> shouldn’t really care that much about whether the poor choose to work. The 
> important thing is just making sure they have a decent standard of living, 
> full stop, and if they choose Keynesian leisure over a low-paying job, that’s 
> their business.

In a book I am reviewing, THE TROUBLE WITH WORK  (a terrific book) the author, 
Kathi Weeks of Duke, proposes a work week of 30 hours, with NO cut in pay AND a 
Basic Income Guarantee --- based on a 1998 manifesto by Stanley Aronowitz and 
others.  That's a proposal from the Left, obviously, and in Weeks case you can 
infer the income level would be significantly higher than what a conservative 
might deem appropriate.

Perhaps you've noticed that on the Right there are today noticable supporters 
of a BIG.  Douthat mentions them but is himself unsold.  He thinks work is 
essential to dignity, mobility and social equality.  (Of course WAGED work is 
not essential to all that but Douthat overlooks that.) 

My point in calling this Douthat essay to your attention is to spur a 
discussion of the BIG as opposed to alternatives.  Weeks points out that a 
dominant strain of Marxist/socialist ideas is to promote more work -- better 
work but work nevertheless.  Kathi Weeks supports less work or no work.

When Occupy or its lineal offspring once more takes the stage, the discussion 
we might now have could be useful.

Gene



_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to