Do you know about the North American BIG coalition? They are having 
their 15th annual meeting in Montreal this summer.
[see http://www.usbig.net/index.php]

Joel Blau



Eugene Coyle wrote:
> "Leaving Work Behind" is the title of a 2/8/2014 NYT essay by the 
> conservative columnist Ross Douthat.  The URL for the column is:
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/09/opinion/sunday/douthat-leaving-work-behind.html?partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
>
> Douthat uses the flap about Obamacare's supposed work disincentive as a 
> departure point.
>
> The thrust of the column is to open a discussion of providing a Basic Income 
> Guarantee (BIG) or Negative Income Tax to replace other parts of the welfare 
> state.
>
> This emerging advocacy of a BIG on the right is troubling.  You'll find this 
> paragraph in the Douthat piece:  
>
>   
>> But it’s also possible to argue that as a rich, post-scarcity society, we 
>> shouldn’t really care that much about whether the poor choose to work. The 
>> important thing is just making sure they have a decent standard of living, 
>> full stop, and if they choose Keynesian leisure over a low-paying job, 
>> that’s their business.
>>     
>
> In a book I am reviewing, THE TROUBLE WITH WORK  (a terrific book) the 
> author, Kathi Weeks of Duke, proposes a work week of 30 hours, with NO cut in 
> pay AND a Basic Income Guarantee --- based on a 1998 manifesto by Stanley 
> Aronowitz and others.  That's a proposal from the Left, obviously, and in 
> Weeks case you can infer the income level would be significantly higher than 
> what a conservative might deem appropriate.
>
> Perhaps you've noticed that on the Right there are today noticable supporters 
> of a BIG.  Douthat mentions them but is himself unsold.  He thinks work is 
> essential to dignity, mobility and social equality.  (Of course WAGED work is 
> not essential to all that but Douthat overlooks that.) 
>
> My point in calling this Douthat essay to your attention is to spur a 
> discussion of the BIG as opposed to alternatives.  Weeks points out that a 
> dominant strain of Marxist/socialist ideas is to promote more work -- better 
> work but work nevertheless.  Kathi Weeks supports less work or no work.
>
> When Occupy or its lineal offspring once more takes the stage, the discussion 
> we might now have could be useful.
>
> Gene
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
>
>
>   


_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to