This misses the point about 'national' manufacturing, which presumably the 
state/politicians want to emphasize. It does't matter how much you outsource as 
long as it is within the national boundary. Perhaps you are referring to off 
shoring, which then becomes international. Hence Apple for all practical 
purposes is not a manufacturer as understood in the national statistics sense. 
But then it does earn a massive profit per employee in the US so it does show 
up in US statistics. At the same time apple's employment impact at home is 
minimal. Now that's the question politicians should be concerned about.

Incidentally today manufacturing is no panacea for employment on a large scale, 
unless it is labor intensive, which sounds oxymoronic since technological 
change and productivity increases are supposedly manufacturing characteristics. 
Only vintage technologies in combination with abundant supply of labor can 
support manufacturing, which even India can't do these days for several 
reasons. India is becoming a place for fabless chip design. No factory, no 
semiconductor manufacturing, no real consumer electronics, but it designs chips 
in virtually every kind of application one can think of. One can clearly see 
that in systemic terms, in the absence of countervailing action, inequality is 
inevitable.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Anthony P. D'Costa, Chair & Professor of Contemporary Indian Studies
Australia India Institute and School of Social & Political Sciences
University of Melbourne
147-149 Barry Street, Carlton VIC 3053, AUSTRALIA
Ph: +61 3 9035 6161
Visit the Australia India Institute Website http://www.aii.unimelb.edu.au/ 

Recent Conference (The Land Question)
http://idsk.edu.in/program.php

Recent books:
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/product/9780198082286.do#.UI5Wzmc2dI0
http://www.oup.com/localecatalogue/cls_academic/?i=9780199646210
http://www.anthempress.com/pdf/9780857285041.pdf
http://www.palgrave.com/products/title.aspx?pid=295354
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Sent from my iPad

> On Mar 15, 2014, at 17:44, <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Classifying a business as manufacturing or non-manufacturing doesn't change 
> the 
> economic relationship.
> 
> A manufacturer can outsource their work to another company and thereby get 
> economies of scale.
> 
> -- 
>    Ron
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to