Terry McDonough says, among many interesting things:

Teaching is also increasingly valued.  New hires at our institution are 
virtually required to sign up 
for a master's degree in third level education which concentrates on teaching 
techniques.  
These techniques are usually inapplicable because they can't be implemented in 
the dominant 
large lecture classes, but will be demanded for promotion because you have been 
taught how to do 
them.  The remainder are about things like "learning outcomes" which are always 
related to 
marketable "skills" which will help the students obtain employment and promote 
national economic 
competitiveness. Finally, the latest fad is promoted like Who Wants to be a 
Millionaire style ask the
audience clickers.  Applicants for promotion must document that they have done 
these things
 in "teaching portfolios."  Customer satisfaction must be demonstrated in 
teaching evaluations from 
students who increasingly don't attend class in any case.

All of this is touted as making academia "accountable" to the larger community. 
 
Be very careful what you wish for.

This and all the other matters Terry posted, along with what Anthony DiMaggio 
wrote on Counterpunch,
to which Terry was responding, have been part of a process going on for many 
years in colleges.
All part of a process aimed at removing control over the way in which teachers 
do their work from the
teachers themselves. Taylorism comes to higher ed. This really puts the Salaita 
case at the University
of Illinois in a broader perspective. Being punished at a public college 
because of what you
say on Twitter or Facebook seems just one of many ways teachers can be and are 
punished for doing what
professors presumably are supposed to do. How are your speech rights not being 
violated if you are fired
because you didn't generate, or actively refused to generate, appropriate 
"learning outcomes." If customer 
satisfaction rules, if we must teach marketable skills, then speaking out on 
public issues on twitter seems
almost beside the point. A Salaita case comes up from time to time, and we must 
all support the victims
of disgusting university actions. But the demeaning of the labor of teaching 
goes on everyday, with all
too many professors, no doubt some who are vocal supporters of Salaita, 
acquiescing to it.                                        
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to