On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Joseph Green <[email protected]>
wrote:

> The state may spend huge amounts on health care without the system being
> universal. Conversely, some plans envision universal compulsion to take
> part
> in private insurance (although the state may still have to spend huge
> amounts
> on health care) and self-insurance. It's important to distinguish between
> the
> various "universal" plans. It's make a big difference to the outcome
> whether
> one is trying to rely on private insurance, private health research,
> private
> health supplies, etc. or has a single-payer system, or a national health
> service, or some other type of health care. It affects whether the system
> really is universal, what type of treatments are given, whether there is a
> two-tier system, and much more, including the type and accuracy of medical
> research. Whether health care - or various parts of it - are done for
> profit
> or not, affects whether there is overmedication, whether certain treatments
> are neglected, etc. (However, it should be noted that by now capitalists
> have
> been able to hide medicine for profit behind many "non-profit" veneers.)
> So
> I agree with Hari Kumar that it doesn't make sense for socialists to hide
> the
> type of "universal" plan being talked out.
>


Can I agree completely with everything you have said above while remaining
confused about what the controversy is about (:-)? I have not seen anyone
on PEN-L dispute any of the above. I think perhaps, you (and Hari Kumar)
interpreted something I (or someone else) wrote as suggesting that
"universal" health-care is equivalent to single-payer or something like
that. If so, I certainly did not intend so suggest any such thing.

Btw your summary at http://communistvoice.org/40cCompare.html
is very informative and useful - thanks!
-raghu.





> As I mentioned previously, I outlined some of the differences in a some
> articles in 2007. I think if you examined them, you might see some of the
> issues involved. See
> http://communistvoice.org/40cChart.html
> for a chart comparing different types of supposedly universal plans, and
> see
> the article at http://communistvoice.org/40cCompare.html
> "What would socialist health care be like?" for an explanation of the
> chart.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
>
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to