"Ok, but what then? "

At the risk of totally alienating the hipsters on this list with my
"certain lack of imagination", I will take the liberty of mentioning that I
wrote a BOOK on this topic, the unpublished manuscript of which has been
available on SCRIBD for about five years, excerpts and adaptations from
which have been presented at conferences and published on various blogs as
well as in a chapter in a published anthology. At every step along the way
I shared the analysis, strategies, rationales and concrete proposals on
PEN-L.

Most of my posts to PEN-L on the topic have gone without reply. When there
have been replies, as with so many mailing list conversations, discussions
often quickly veered off-topic. I have come to the conclusion that PEN-L
isn't a place that I can expect much of an engaged discussion of the issue.
So I don't keep beating my head against that brick wall.

One of the obstacles to thinking about the issue is the utterly unfounded
and untheorized dichotomous notion that "revolution" consists of seizing
state power and that "reform" consists of policy actions urged to be taken
by the existing bourgeois state authorities.

My proposals consist of neither strategies for seizing state power nor
electoral campaign platform demands.

What I have proposed instead is the formation of new kinds of collective
institutions that have ample precedent in existing institutions. These new
institutions would be based on a reconceptualization of "work" and
"property" along lines that SHOULD be comprehendible to those who have read
Marx but that are not exclusively or orthodoxly "Marxist" -- namely the
reconceptualization of labor power as a common-pool resource.

How does *wage* labor differ from labor *power*? How do common-pool
resources differ from private goods or public goods? How are they similar?
My proposals only make sense in the context of answers to these questions.

I have no objection to policy proposals like paid family leave. They may
even open space for more in depth discussion of the issue of working time.
But such policy proposals do not begin to address the fundamental problem
of the ecological unsustainability of wage labor, capital accumulation and
industrial-scale conversion of habitat to toxic waste.

-- 
Cheers,

Tom Walker (Sandwichman)
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to