Andy Nachos writes: >This is a highly fact intensive inquiry -- was there >some sort of fraud or injustice, what were the >relationships between the two entities or the >stockholder and the corporation, etc.
Exactly. My point is made for me. Everything is inquisitive. More than that, everything is made up on the fly to satisfy equity. Why are we leaving this to the courts? To make what should be very simple law? You are a legal entity one day, and then not. I am sure the criminal bar would like the same for their clients. (To extend the legal analogy.) In human law, there is just a person. Period. Again, my question is almost based on a philosophical point: Why can judges allow/uncreate people at will? If you take the 1897 Salomon decison as strict rule, then the rest is easy. Ken. P.S. Justin wrote of Conrad Black: "Depends on the facts." Well, no shit. :)
