So pleasant to talk with you, and you are so gracious too. Well, have fun with attempting to understand the law. It is full of traps and pitfalls for the unwary.
Ta, jks --- Kenneth Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Last try for me, too: your ability to "read and > receive" is about equal > to your ability to "spell and conceive." > > Ken. > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: PEN-L list [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of andie > >nachgeborenen > >Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 1:36 AM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: [PEN-L] Corporate Personality Doctrine > -- Quite Irrelevant > > > > > >Last try. The Corporate Personlity Doctrine is a > >well-defined, highly precise, very limited doctrine > >that is totally irrelevant to issues of corporate > or > >shareholder liability. The CPD says taht for > certian > >purposes, corporations are persons are the 14th and > >5th amendement. They are entitled to freedom of > >speech, due process, equal protection, etc. That > has > >zippo to do witj wthet you can reach a shareholder > >behind a corporate form. The latter question is a > >matter of piercing the corporate veil. This has > >nothing, I repeat NOTHING, to do with corporate > >personality. The element or requirement in > >veil-piercing you object to, fraud or injustice, is > >not ill-defined either. Basically it says no harm > no > >foul: you can't go behind the corporate form even > if > >formalities have not been observed it no one was > >harmed by the failure to observe these formalities. > It > >is essentially a standing-like requirement, no > injury, > >no cause of action. I hope this is now clear. > _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Express yourself with Y! Messenger! Free. Download now. http://messenger.yahoo.com
