Carrol: >Russell once pointed out (only vaguely remembered and paraphrased here) >that while an inconsistent theory could be partly right, a wholly >consistent theory was totally wrong if any part of it was wrong.
Euble: >Of course, some of Russell's own pet theories contained >inconsistencies so we have a bit of a problem with the above :-) Are do not humans act paraconsistently? (And, is that sentence not tautological?) What changes minds? Belief systems? Michael said nothing here on Kerry/Bush had done so. Doug said nothing ever had. Michael countered something had. I would agree with the latter more. Life just changes things, ya think? Fixed theories are not so good for humans... Ken.
