Who is it who has painted capital as omnipotent? Not I. Jim Devine, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; web: http://myweb.lmu.edu/jdevine/
> -----Original Message----- > From: PEN-L list [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Eubulides > Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 1:45 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PEN-L] "the Incredibles" > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Devine, James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > The existence of science reflects the resistance by scientists. But > increasingly much of that has been co-opted by science-for-profit > schemes, as in the pharmaceutical industry, or by science-for-war > schemes. > > ---- > > Except that has nothing to do with deskilling and enforcement of > mediocrity. The seamy underbelly of science has been with us since > Galileo. Resistance ain't a one way street, so the incessant > painting of > capital as omnipotent in order to justify one's cynicism is > self-defeating.
