> > Citing Trotsky and Gramsci one is saying that somehow the bourgeoisie will > > go easy on proletariat, and not institute fascism domestically in the > U.S. , > > because the proletariat is not rising up in the U.S. in 2005. As if the > > bourgeoisie would only institute fascism as a last ditch measure against a > > proletariat about to take power. You don't know the viciousness of the > > bourgeoisie , if you are relying on their not having domestic fascism > > because the proletariat is weak relative to its strength in Europe in the > > 20's and 30's. The bourgeoisie are quite capable of kicking the > proletariat > > when it is down. Fighting dirty. Dirtier than even you seem to imagine. > > Waging an unfair fight.
so fascism involves "unfairness"? isn't capitalism "unfair," too? if so, isn't fascism is the same thing as capitalism? then why use the extra word? -- Jim Devine "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante.
