The supreme court ruled that it was HIS responsibility to monitor his fields to prevent him from "benefiting" from Monsanto's property.
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 01:53:17PM -0700, raghu wrote: > On 7/22/06, Leigh Meyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > It wasn't even Monsanto's crop... It cross-pollinated, and damaged Percy > > Schmeiser's crops and livelihood. > > > > > Fascinating. Schmeiser should be counter-suing Monsanto because their > product illegally trespassed into his property and damaged his crops. > Property rights cut both ways after all, right? > > Best I could find from Google, this case is not over yet: > > http://www.biotech-info.net/rejoins_battle.html > > -raghu. -- Michael Perelman Economics Department California State University Chico, CA 95929 Tel. 530-898-5321 E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu
