On 5/15/07, Ted Winslow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


What role does Brenner give to the "passions" in this sense in the
transition?

Ted


I don't know about the passions in relation to "...Hegel's sublation of Smith
the idea of the "passions" in this sense as productive of positive
consequences..."

But Benjamin Franklin was very explicit on the topic of 'passions',
and their end results:

"Sir, there are two passions which have a powerful influence on the
affairs of men. These are ambition and avarice; the love of power, and
the love of money.

Separately each of these has great force in prompting men to action;
but when united in view of the same object, they have in many minds
the most violent effects.

Place before the eyes of such men, a post of honour that shall be at
the same time a place of profit, and they will move heaven and earth
to obtain it.

The vast number of such places it is that renders the British
Government so tempestuous. The struggles for them are the true sources
of all these factions which are perpetually dividing the Nation,
distracting its Councils, hurrying sometimes into fruitless and
mischievous wars, and often compelling a submission to dishonorable
terms of peace.

And of what kind are the men that will strive for this profitable
pre-eminence, through all the bustle of cabal, the heat of contention,
the infinite mutual abuse of parties, tearing to pieces the best of
characters?

It will not be the wise and moderate; the lovers of peace and good
order, the men fittest for the trust. It will be the bold and the
violent, the men of strong passions and indefatigable activity in
their selfish pursuits.

These will thrust themselves into your Government and be your rulers.

And these too will be mistaken in the expected happiness of their
situation: For their vanquished competitors of the same spirit, and
from the same motives will perpetually be endeavouring to distress
their administration, thwart their measures, and render them odious to
the people."

--Benjamin Franklin, Letter to the Federal Constitutional Convention
in objection to the establishment of a salary for the executives of
the federal government - June 2, 1778 (Antifederalist #5)

Reply via email to