I understand that, but Smith is wrong, particularly where he states: "He makes this change in the "passions" dominant in agriculture a significant contributor to "the improvement and cultivation of the country." That change in passions requires is a change in class; and the economic, property, social change precedes that.
-----Original Message----- >From: Ted Winslow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: May 16, 2007 11:48 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [PEN-L] I say po-tay-to, you say po-tah-to >
