I agree with Carrol. I think that the key debate is between the subjectivist or idealist interpretation, in which the "passions" are primary, and the materialist one (of Marx), where the objective structures and dynamics of the currently-dominant mode of production determines which passions are given the biggest role, which are rewarded and cultivated.
"s.artesian" wrote:
> At some point, I would like to comment on Ted's linkage of > Hegel and Marx and what Marx actually did with Hegel' > categories and linkages, i.e "stages of the human mind." > My view is very different than Ted's, but the discussion > might not be of interest to the rest of the list.
Carrol Cox wrote:
Self-censorship not appropriate. Go ahead with the discussion and let list subscribers decide for themselves if they are interested. I think it's an important concern.
-- Jim Devine / "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante.
