OK, will take a little time to get it organized...
-----Original Message----- >From: Jim Devine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: May 18, 2007 5:37 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [PEN-L] Passions, Hegel, Marx, Smith etc. was ...po-tah-to > >I agree with Carrol. I think that the key debate is between the >subjectivist or idealist interpretation, in which the "passions" are >primary, and the materialist one (of Marx), where the objective >structures and dynamics of the currently-dominant mode of production >determines which passions are given the biggest role, which are >rewarded and cultivated. > >"s.artesian" wrote: >> > At some point, I would like to comment on Ted's linkage of >> > Hegel and Marx and what Marx actually did with Hegel' >> > categories and linkages, i.e "stages of the human mind." >> > My view is very different than Ted's, but the discussion >> > might not be of interest to the rest of the list. > >Carrol Cox wrote: >> Self-censorship not appropriate. Go ahead with the discussion and let >> list subscribers decide for themselves if they are interested. I think >> it's an important concern. > > > >-- >Jim Devine / "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your >own way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante.
