> Also, the point has been made before -- can you imagine if a tv network
> would advocate antigovernment policies.  They don't even report very much
> on antipolitical activities, except to denounce the protestors or make
> them seem ridiculous.
>
>
>
> Michael Perelman
> Economics Department
> California State University
> Chico, Ca
> 95929

I'm not sure that's a very strong argument, to be quite honest. So far all
the arguments here I've seen for Chavez' suppression of RCTV consist of
"they were undermining the government" or "advocating antigovernment
policies". Well, guess what a vast majority of people would say about
socialists and socialist news sources? What if President Bush decided
tomorrow to suppress Air America or even just The Militant because they
"advocate antigovernment policies", or "undermine the government"? Or
Blair does the same with the Weekly Worker, which after all explicitly
states it supports revolution against the existing monarchy? I think we
wouldn't hear as much support here.

Now I don't think this is really a free speech issue (rather détournement
de pouvoir if anything), but this argument can backfire really badly.

Matthijs Krul

Reply via email to