http://www.ucolick.org/~de/Snarf/EthanolScam_Corny.JPG

"DeAnander and Nomad ask what it would mean to take seriously the
Other Option — the one that capitalism cannot afford to put on the
table, but which humanity cannot afford to keep off the table — the
option of contraction, convergence, and demand reduction. What would
it really mean to live a "sustainable" lifestyle? What would we have
to give up? What hard choices would have to be made? Would we really
be "shivering in the dark" as anti-environmentalist propaganda
repeatedly asserts? Or could a sustainable level of energy and
material consumption be satisfactory — comfortable, amusing, convivial
and pleasant enough to keep us happy?

After so many decades of the feverish dogwaggery of industrial and
finance capitalism, are we even capable any longer of honestly
distinguishing want from need? What are the consequences if we cannot
learn to do so? How can we go about understanding the true cost of how
we live and what it means — for our own future, and for others? How
does one even start on an "energy audit" of one's consumption and
living habits? How does one deal with the results, if the answer is
"It would take 2 Earths for everyone to live the way I live"? What
practical steps can we take to make our way of life more negotiable?

We'll start a thread at Feral Scholar for further discussion. Below
the fold, you'll find the article in full:

In the last diary I metaphorically cartooned our civilisation as a hot
air balloon losing altitude, with the passengers tossing things
overboard — hopefully not each other — to try to gain altitude or at
least to soften the inevitable landing. And I asserted that we were
going to have to jettison some foundational beliefs of our culture,
which — as Jared Diamond reminds us at great length and detail in his
Collapse tome — is not easy for a culture to do. Some have literally
chosen to commit collective or civilisational suicide rather than toss
the baggage."

In full: 
http://www.insurgentamerican.net/2007/07/07/something-to-be-enthusiastic-about-thinking-about-demand-reduction/

Reply via email to