Greetings Economists,
On Nov 13, 2007, at 12:49 PM, Carrol Cox wrote:

So it's politically not too bright to throw "fascist" around in u.s.
politics.

Doyle;
It's clear to me that 'fascist' is long since lost it's roots in
militaristic mass movements and become in the U.S. synonymous with
foreign imperialist war and at home police state mechanisms.  It's
widely enough used that George W. Bush, himself, can use it to apply
to 'Islam-o-fascist'.  If the term is what the public uses I don't see
your point in calling it stupid.  You may disagree, say it's rooted in
meaning something different.  but to say it's stupid questions what
mass usage and meaning is in terms of intelligence standards.  And
that contradicts your own principles I'm sure in ways that could tie
you in knots about what you 'really' understand.

In other words you seem to me to use stupid in the handy dandy way of
frustrated people to label someone casually in a derogatory way to
underscore your point.  Of course to me this so-called stupidity is a
question of cognitive disability too.  The more I explore these issues
aside from trying to chide someone, the more I find the complexity
both daunting and educating.  Here you mean to shame someone by
missing the meaning.  How is meaning missed?  The persons brain
doesn't work.  Doesn't work?  Doesn't hear, read, or what?  Writing is
a complex system of communication which for large numbers of people
doesn't work as a means of communication.  Being illiterate is not
stupid as the left well knows.  It's the social support of the
community that is 'stupid' or lacking.  But the social support for
literate people can simply ignore dyslexia, or other learning
disabilities.

Since you spent your life teaching English, the weakness of writing
itself has been ignored in your professional life.  I've never once
seen you question writing like I do.  But I don't see you as stupid.
I see our whole society as not supportive of communication in so many
ways.  In a technical sense these issues are about knowledge
production and we could see this material production as economic, but
Pen-L demands more than epithets like stupid.
thanks,
Doyle

Reply via email to