Michael a. Lebowitz wrote:
> Yes, Louis got it. Within specific organisations linked by a common
> purpose, I support rotation of responsibilities because it allows for
> more even development, thereby strengthening all and democracy. But
> in the process of class struggle, if you prevent people from deciding
> who best to provide leadership in the struggle, who then decides? Money, no?

The ban on repeated reelection can easily be totally irrelevant. The
1911 Revolution made the slogan "¡No Reelección!" the rule in Mexico.
But the Institutionalized Revolution Party (PRI) was "reelected" again
and again.
-- 
Jim Devine / "The radios blare muzak and newzak, diseases are cured every day /
the worst disease is to be unwanted, to be used up, and cast away." --
Peter Case ("Poor Old Tom").

Reply via email to