On Aug 2, 2007, at 3:29 AM, Roch - PAE wrote: > ... > Is so, this is by design of NFS. Not much you can do about it. > Maybe NFS V4++ will find a way.... > .. > http://blogs.sun.com/roch/entry/nfs_and_zfs_a_fine >
great blog entry! Any chance of a multithreaded tar in the default indiana? Assuming I ever knew, I have forgotten, is there any "loophole" in the NFS specification that allows a client and a server to communicate precise version/id info, so an alternative to the gratuitous COMIT operation could be negotiated when the client is happy to let ZFS do "the right thing"? > Keith H. Bierman [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Strategic Engagement Team | sun IM: khb AIM: kbiermank 5430 Nassau Circle East | 650-352-4432 voice+fax Cherry Hills Village, CO 80113 | sun internal 68207 http://blogs.sun.com/khb | 303-997-2749 <speaking for myself, not Sun*> Copyright 2007 ------------------------------------------------------------ NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. _______________________________________________ perf-discuss mailing list perf-discuss@opensolaris.org
