On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 03:50:19PM -0600, Keith Bierman wrote: > Posit suitable battery backed up or nonvolatile cache. It would take > collusion (thus consent ;>) of both the client and server;
No, it'd just mean you could respond to the commits more quickly, because part of your "stable storage" is lower-latency. No new protocol required. Unless I'm totally misunderstanding the suggestion. --b. _______________________________________________ perf-discuss mailing list perf-discuss@opensolaris.org
