On Thu, 17 Apr 2014, Philip Mucci wrote:

> Now, we could do it the other way, where PAPI strips off it’s own umasks
> first and hand it to libpfm… but then we would run the risk of pre-empting
> whatever future umasks you provide in libpfm. There is NO call in libpfm to
> say “tell me all the umasks that might be part of events” such that PAPI can
> screen for umasks that it wants.

well we could just delcare that all PAPI umasks start with PAPI_
It's probably unlikely a real umask will start like that.

Either that or we'll have to define a separate PAPI umask separator, using 
; instead of : or something.

Vince
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
"Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their
applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,
this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/NeoTech
_______________________________________________
perfmon2-devel mailing list
perfmon2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perfmon2-devel

Reply via email to