Hi Stephane,
Please please consider this type of ABI change a compile time option. Breaking
the ABI to use a set of hardware that most users don’t use (nor have
permissions to use courtesy of our friend perf_event_paranoid) really doesn’t
make sense.
phil
> On Apr 1, 2017, at 1:03 AM, Stephane Eranian <eran...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> Ok, my bad. That was not my goal here.
> We can revert this change. But to enable support, this struct will
> need to change.
> So it will incur some ABI change.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
perfmon2-devel mailing list
perfmon2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perfmon2-devel
