Phil, On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Philip Mucci <mu...@icl.utk.edu> wrote: > Hi Stephane, > > Please please consider this type of ABI change a compile time option. > Breaking the ABI to use a set of hardware that most users don’t use (nor > have permissions to use courtesy of our friend perf_event_paranoid) really > doesn’t make sense. > I will revert this patch and release 4.9. Would that solve your problem?
> phil > > On Apr 1, 2017, at 1:03 AM, Stephane Eranian <eran...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > Ok, my bad. That was not my goal here. > We can revert this change. But to enable support, this struct will > need to change. > So it will incur some ABI change. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ perfmon2-devel mailing list perfmon2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perfmon2-devel
