On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 22:45 -0500, Robert Love wrote:
> Oh, I bet I know what happened. The function is static. And gcc
> realizes it is const. And static const functions are merged into the
> caller if possible. So the "42" was just pasted into the call site.
Eh, I should have pointed out that "constant merging" is not really the
same as function inlining.
But -- it seems gcc will perform Morten's mysterious inlining if you
make the function (at least superficially) non-const.
So, still baffled.
Robert Love
_______________________________________________
Performance-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/performance-list
