On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 17:00 +0000, Padraig O'Briain wrote: > I see that pango_font_map_load_font is called about 200 times; 12 of > these calls are for description "Bitstream Vera Sans" and the rest are > for "Sans". The cost of the calls for "Sans" are negligible excapt for > the first one. > > The calls for "Bitstream Vera Sans" are the calls which call FcFontSort > and cost about 30 ms each.
So far no one has replied to this question: > One simple question that will undoubtedly give away my ignorance: why > does fcmatch.c use doubles for the match distances? How big can those > values grow, anyway? The only double-ish thing I can see there is the > initializations of big values to 1e99, only to be replaced immediately > by small numbers when doing the comparisons. I guess we could start with the optimizations there. Also, aside from Stephan's example on how to write a benchmark, did anyone actually implement a benchmark yet and profile it? Federico _______________________________________________ Performance-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/performance-list
