On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 7:13 AM Mathieu Lonjaret <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, 7 Sep 2018 at 14:05, Christopher Nielsen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I've been intrigued by the combination of perkeep with upspin for some > > time, and I've seen a few mentions of the two maybe being able to work > > together. > > > > I finally have some time outside work to hack on this a bit to see if > > it might be useful together. > > > > First, is anyone else exploring this? If so, maybe we should collaborate. > > I don't think anyone is.
Good to know. I just wanted to check. > > Second, I am still navigating both codebases and docs, so I will > > likely have questions about both. Based on following the list for a > > while, it seems questions about perkeep are welcome. > > yes, you've come to the right place for questions. :-) Excellent! > > When I have some semblance of a prototype, should I submit an issue to > > the tracker? > > it's always better to have an open issue as a starting point and reference, > yes. > depending on what you're interesting in doing exactly, you might want > to reuse https://github.com/perkeep/perkeep/issues/910 though. Better to piggyback on an existing issue, I think. I'll add some comments there. Thanks! -- Christopher Nielsen "They who can give up essential liberty for temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." --Benjamin Franklin "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants." --Thomas Jefferson -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Perkeep" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
