hi, Thats right. But ML is a category under AI in broad. isn't it? So can we split it that way?
bharani --- Ken Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm wondering whether we want to create an ML:: > namespace for > Machine Learning stuff. The reasons in favor might > be: > > 1) "AI" is sort of a loaded term, and attracts its > fair share > of wackos. For this reason, many researchers eschew > it. > > 2) Many interesting things would fit better into > "Machine > Learning" than they would into AI, just because they > don't > really claim to be "intelligent", but they do learn > from > observed data. > > Reasons against might be: > > 1) "ML" isn't nearly as well-known a term as "AI", > so casual > browsers of CPAN won't find things there as easily. > > 2) The AI:: namespace already exists and contains > some > interesting things, and it would be a shame to split > the > namespace without a good reason. > > Comments? > > I ask because I'm working on a rewrite of > AI::Categorize, and > I'm wondering whether it might fit better under the > ML:: > namespace. > > -Ken > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more http://games.yahoo.com/
