Matt Youell wrote: > AI::Categorize. Tasks like categorization, taxonomy, etc. seem to be less > "AI" and more Knowledge Management (KM).
I dunno. That really depends on what you define as AI. Traditionally, the AI net is cast broadly enough to cover those things. > Knowledge Management is an existing > term that's common in Fortune 500 settings (vs. academia), and there are > many active products exploring that market right now. It's a common enough > term to be recognized, still broad, And this touches on the heart of the problem, as I've described in another email. It's not that "AI" carries a lot of baggage... So what? It's that the category is just TOO broad! I actually like "ML::", except for the fact that it would no doubt have other meanings to other people. (Someone said there is no precedent for top-level names for other languages. In fact, there is "C::", but admittedly that's a special case.) And I'm thinking that acronyms are probably suboptimal, in general. -- John Douglas Porter
