On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:10:50AM +0000, Paul Howarth wrote: > On 21/02/11 10:46, Petr Pisar wrote: > > commit 1285f98b06408386236a3dbb1b261c9e4af55290 > > Author: Petr Písař<[email protected]> > > Date: Mon Feb 21 11:45:56 2011 +0100 > > > > 5.37 bump > > > +# Version unversioned Provides > > +%filter_from_provides s/^\(perl(Coro\>[^=]*\)$/\1 = %{version}/ > > I think if you're going to add a version number to the provides, it > might be better to use 0 rather than %{version}; many module authors > version sub-modules differently to the main module included in a > package, so you may be creating versioned provides that are "newer" than > ones that upstream may introduce in the future. >
These one is subsequent Perl module in the same file extending non-Coro module, so IMO it should have the same version as main module. Injecting 0 is pointless. Better no version than useless 0. -- Petr
pgp5lnx96T1P8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
