01-07-12 19.54, skrev Doug MacEachern p� [EMAIL PROTECTED] f�ljande:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
>
>> i don't see any regcomp.h change from you, you mean your regexec.c change?
>> anyhow, that change did not fix the problem for me.
>> i just backed out your change (11299), with mine still in there and all
>> tests pass.
>
> actually, 2 tests fail after backing out 11299:
> lib/extutils.......................make[3]: *** [ExtTest.c] Error 139
> FAILED at test 4
> lib/ExtUtils.......................make[3]: *** [ExtTest.c] Error 139
> FAILED at test 4
>
> looking into it.
>
>
Ok, this is wierd. I only got failures in pat regexp and regexp-something
with the PMOP fix patch. I didn't get any segfaults in perl_destruct except
in those. Backing out 11299 should fail pat.t for perl_destruct.
I can't understand why those SvIVs ened a higher refcount.
Artur
