01-07-12 20.16, skrev Doug MacEachern p� [EMAIL PROTECTED] f�ljande:
> looking at it again, our patches are not related. your patch to regcomp.c
> just creates the PL_regex_padav entry for PL_reg_curpm, mine applies to
> all the rest in newPMOP. as for leaks, i don't see any running the leak
> program i posted a while back (the ones i saw then were cured by #11188)
> i'm curious, how does PL_regex_padav get released? i don't see a
> SvREFCNT_dec(PL_regex_padav) anywhere.
Yes, but I can't see why those SvIVs need higher refcount than 1. And why
only you were seeing those crashes!
It isn't freed so there should most defintly be a leak.
Working on that patch for freeing it and reusing emptied fields in it.
Artur
