On s�ndag, mar 16, 2003, at 00:48 Europe/Stockholm, nadim wrote:
In the same spirit as 'ithreads vs. 5.005 threads [gratuitous bitching]' I
wrote a "'ithreads' considered useless" and
mailed it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] has it is a more active (though general'
mailling list. I and the other member of the
list would appreciate your opinions.
I would appreciate any suggestions (not rants) how these problems with threads.pm could be solved.
Fact is, 5005 threads were abandoned because no one stepped forward to make them work, so apparently enough people didn't care for them.
Arthur
